From extraction to a record you can inspect.

The reviewed object is frozen first

Every assessment should point to an exact product, ingredient form, wording, market, channel and content version. A conclusion cannot be reconstructed if the reviewed input keeps moving.

• Input snapshot and content identifier
• Product and audience context
• Jurisdiction and publication channel

AI extracts candidate facts

AI identifies candidate health claims, nutrition claims, ingredient statements, warnings and marketing language. Extraction structures the material for review; it is not the regulatory conclusion.

Names and context are normalised

Substances, botanical parts, extract forms, units, daily portions, target groups and wording variants are converted into comparable records. Unresolved identity stays visible instead of being silently guessed.

Deterministic rules evaluate context

Structured checks evaluate the candidate material against the relevant jurisdiction, product category, substance, wording and conditions of use. Rule identifiers and versions make the result repeatable.

Primary sources form the evidence chain

Findings link directly to responsible public authorities and legal texts wherever possible. Binding legislation, official registers and authority guidance retain their source type, scope and checked date.

• EUR-Lex and national legal acts
• European Commission registers and Union lists
• GIS and other responsible public authorities

Uncertainty is part of the output

Novel Food status, botanicals, product classification and marketing context can depend on evidence that no automated rule can safely infer. Suppvera records uncertainty, missing evidence and review-required states.

Human judgement has a named scope

The Reviewed by field identifies the person or team responsible for the editorial regulatory review and states its scope. A person and professional title are published only after identity and qualifications have been verified. Review is not certification or legal advice.

Every regulatory page carries its review record

A published record shows its reviewer, direct source links, last regulatory review date, jurisdiction, rule version, change history and a link back to this methodology.

Changes trigger a new review

A source amendment, authority update, product-context change, corrected interpretation or material evidence gap creates a new version. The history explains what changed rather than silently replacing the previous state.

People make the final market decision

Suppvera supports regulatory teams but does not guarantee compliance. Qualified regulatory or legal review remains appropriate for ambiguous, high-risk or market-critical decisions.